Re: Capturing inconsistency in beam subdivision length

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi Urs,

> Opinions?

I agree with Gould: (b), with the one adjustment, is superior.

> what this seems to call for is an update
> to the beaming pattern calculation, something like (an optional) "do not
> further subdivide a group that already has exactly four notes" rule. But
> somehow I'm afraid of skating on thin ice when going into that direction.

Yeah… As soon as you get into tuplets, that ice gets even thinner.  :\
Not sure how to advise.

But many many thanks for you efforts in this area — it’s bound to make a huge 
positive difference!

Best,
Kieren.
________________________________

Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden