[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A big advantage to lilypond
From: |
Redwood (Daniel) |
Subject: |
A big advantage to lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:46:33 -0700 |
Hi all,
I’m converting from Sibelius. Not a simple, quick project. I have probably more
than a hundred scores in Sibelius. So I’m looking for reasons to do this, aside
from the difficulty of their licensing scheme.
One thing I love about lilypond: when I find a file on IMSLP with the source.
Then I can make my own modifications.
But I wonder: why aren’t more lilypond authors posting more of their sources to
IMSLP? And is there some way to find the lilypond source files — the pieces
that have lilypond sources. I found some through their postings on a French
site (can’t think of the name now), but it’s on about a dozen pieces, none of
which interest me.
Music I’m going to perform, I usually typeset anyway, partly as a way to learn
the music. But much of what I play is for my enjoyment, and I don’t rescore it.
Also, much music like Beethoven sonatas are a great deal of trouble to
score/typeset.
This is not really a question, but more a note to say that I get how important
this is for sharing music. Sibelius scores could also be shared, but it’s kind
of rude to ask someone to pay for it.
I’m using Frescobaldi now as a front-end. It has a number of useful features. I
also tried plugs in for vim and Atom, but was frustrated with those.
-d
- A big advantage to lilypond,
Redwood (Daniel) <=
Re: A big advantage to lilypond, Simon Albrecht, 2016/03/22