[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond error behaviour
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond error behaviour |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:05:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Hi,
Am 16.04.2016 um 12:52 schrieb Urs Liska:
> There should be *some* sort of order of severity, like "warning",
> "serious error", "fatal error".
Yes. And the wording not only concerns the error itself. But also the
rest of the message. If I compile:
\version "2.19.80"
{ a }
I get a perfectly fine output, but the message reads:
fatal error: failed files: "test.ly"
In this thread we already talked about the fatal (which is exaggerated
here), but also the 'failed' is misleading as the comilation of the file
did not fail, it just had (maybe severe, because unpredictable) errors.
So, I agree with Urs.
Cheers,
Joram
- Lilypond error behaviour, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/15
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/15
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Urs Liska, 2016/04/15
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/15
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Richard Shann, 2016/04/16
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Kastrup, 2016/04/16
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/16
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Urs Liska, 2016/04/16
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour,
Noeck <=
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Wright, 2016/04/16
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Andrew Bernard, 2016/04/17
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Simon Albrecht, 2016/04/17
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Urs Liska, 2016/04/17
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Stephan Neuhaus, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Wright, 2016/04/18
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Stephan Neuhaus, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Wright, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, Sharon Rosner, 2016/04/19
- Re: Lilypond error behaviour, David Kastrup, 2016/04/19