Re: Lilypond error behaviour

[Urs Liska]

Am 17. April 2016 10:51:34 MESZ, schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 17. April 2016 08:20:52 MESZ, schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>>>A warning is appropriate for something which is not an error: namely
>>>LilyPond has a well-specified task but the results will not likely
>>>make sense.  LilyPond does not return an error code for a warning.
>>
>> Well, then let LilyPond report an error when it encounters one. But
>> only then a "fatal" one when it actually forces LilyPond to stop.
>
>For any _correct_ input, LilyPond is eventually forced to stop.

This is the point where I have to say you are talking bullshit, deliberately 
(?) and arbitrarily flipping around everyone's words and intentions. It doesn't 
make sense to continue with that thread.