Re: Lilypond error behaviour

[mskala]

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, David Kastrup wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > If compiling the file has failed to such a degree that we are choosing
> > to call it a "fatal error," that means the PDF is *not* suitable for
> > further use.  Conversely, if you think the generated PDF is still
> > useful, then don't call what happened a "fatal error" - it must have
> > really been a warning.
>
> With that definition, any error that does not terminally destroy the
> computer is not a fatal error since otherwise you can still debug the
> problem.

That is not true.

-- 
Matthew Skala
address@hidden                 People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/