Re: Scheme book (p)review

[Thomas Liggett]

Urs Liska <ul <at> openlilylib.org> writes:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> preparing a course I'm going to give in June and July turned into a
> substantial task: I'm ending up writing the book that *I* would have
> needed some years ago. Basically what I'm trying to do is give readers a
> chance to properly understand how Scheme can basically be used in
> LilyPond. It's the same objective as the Scheme tutorials started a
> while ago on Scores of Beauty, but heading for some kind of
> comprehensiveness.
> 
> The book is far from complete and from a state where I'd publicly share
> the link but if anyone is interested in (p)reviewing i I'll do so
> privately. Basically I'm interested in three kinds of critical looks
> from different kinds of readers:
> 
> - pointing to issues that are not explained clearly or thoroughly enough
>   (i.e for example where I'm still relying on knowledge the reader
> doesn't have yet)
> - comments on missing topics
> - spotting factual errors
> 
> Best
> Urs
> 

Hi Urs,

I’d be interested in proofreading as well, from the point of view of a
beginning user to whom, frustratingly, Scheme is a closed book.

For what it’s worth, I’m an editor/proofreader in my day job.

Kind regards,
Thomas