[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attachments and digest mode
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: attachments and digest mode |
Date: |
Fri, 6 May 2016 15:08:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329 |
On 5/5/16 8:13 PM, "Cynthia Karl" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In my experience, all are available through links, but never the ones
>>> given in the digest.
>>
>> Links on digest work for me, but I get them in a special mode on
>>Outlook.
>
>The special mode must originate with the digest sender, because I canĀ¹t
>imagine how Outlook could otherwise convert the links I get into the
>actual links.
>
>What mode is it? Can you send me in private an example of such a digest?
At my configuration page for lilyond-user I select digest mode, MIME.
When I do this, the emails in the digest show up as attachments to the
digest email, and I must read them in preview mode in Outlook. If I then
open one of the attached digest emails, I can reply to that single email,
and all of the attachments work properly.
In contrast, I have set lilypond-auto to give me plain text digests. This
creates a single plain text email with all of the individual emails
concatenated below as plain text. On this list there are no attachments,
so I don't know if the attachment links work or not.
Plain text mode is easier to read; MIME mode is easier to reply to. I
used to hate MIME mode because it was harder to read, but now I have
figured out how to work with it in Outlook. So I like it for the user
list. BTW, MIME mode is what GNU recommends.
Thanks,
Carl
Re: attachments and digest mode, David Wright, 2016/05/05