[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Single-note tremolos
From: |
Malte Meyn |
Subject: |
Re: Single-note tremolos |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2016 21:20:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 |
Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, but
in LilyPond they are the same thickness).
IMO your variant isn’t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim
now. Two ideas:
1. Does Gould say something about *how much* thinner they should be?
2. Shouldn’t the space between the beams be reduced at the same or at
least similar amount?
4) For notes on a staff line, the tremolo line closest to the heads
centered on a staff space. This is allowed in Gould, but not recommended.
The recommendation is that single tremolo strokes should center on a staff
line. The closest stroke and the single stroke are in the same position
in LilyPond, so I think it is best to move them to a staff line.
This thread from August 2015 might be related:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-08/msg00175.html
I posted a bug and an imperfect workaround there. I also reported the
bug here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-07/msg00067.html
But I don’t think it’s been added to the tracker yet (IMO it’s different
from issue 3143, explanation see this thread).