[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
Subject: |
Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2016 18:01:45 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506 |
Hi Richard,
Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me
these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time to
time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing errors.
Even though an old print, it’s pretty miserable music printing for the era all
said.
Andrew
- Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/21
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710),
Andrew Bernard <=
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Simon Albrecht, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Simon Albrecht, 2016/05/23
- Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)), Richard Shann, 2016/05/23
- Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)), Thomas Morley, 2016/05/23
- Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)), Richard Shann, 2016/05/24