[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: high-precision tuner app
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: OT: high-precision tuner app |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2016 17:38:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 25/05/16 07:05, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Since we're OT anyhow...
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 13:58:48 +0100
> Anthonys Lists <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Not a modern phenomenon. A lot of Baroque parts are almost unsingable in
>> the original pitch because they were written for A=400 or somesuch.
>
> Why are they almost unsingable? They were sung at the time they were
> written. Did the human voice get higher since?
>
> Just curious.
>
Maybe I didn't word it very well. Take a Baroque part, written for eg
A=400, and try and sing it at the modern A=440 without transposing it.
Painful ... in other words the pitch has risen but, obviously, our
voices haven't risen with it.
Dunno why I was doing it, but I discovered all this from Wikipedia some
time ago. Iirc A=440 is the original ISO standard number 1 :-)
Cheers,
Wol
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, (continued)
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app,
Wols Lists <=
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2016/05/25
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Johan Vromans, 2016/05/25
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Shane Brandes, 2016/05/25
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Michael Hendry, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Hans Ã…berg, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, N. Andrew Walsh, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2016/05/26
- Re: OT: high-precision tuner app, Jacques Menu Muzhic, 2016/05/26