[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible note for expressive marks
From: |
Wols Lists |
Subject: |
Re: invisible note for expressive marks |
Date: |
Sat, 28 May 2016 22:00:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 28/05/16 19:03, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 28.05.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
>> The expressive marks must be attached to a note. I was wondering if it
>> exists any void/invisible note that it is possible to use to avoid
>> this constraint, something like: "voidelement" \p
>
> That's exactly what I used as an example in you other thread:
>
> <>\p does exactly what you need ;-)
>
Not always :-)
The alternative format would be something like
\times 2/3 { \once \hidenote c8 \glissando d4 }
I probably haven't got the syntax quite right - I used it recently but
can't remember it exactly. But if your "expressive mark" needs to be
attached to a pitch, this is it ...
Thanks to the people who pointed this out to me.
Cheers,
Wol
- invisible note for expressive marks, Gianmaria Lari, 2016/05/28
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Abraham Lee, 2016/05/28
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Gianmaria Lari, 2016/05/29
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Thomas Morley, 2016/05/29
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, David Kastrup, 2016/05/29
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Thomas Morley, 2016/05/29
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Gianmaria Lari, 2016/05/29
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks, David Kastrup, 2016/05/29
Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Urs Liska, 2016/05/28
Re: invisible note for expressive marks, Marc Hohl, 2016/05/28
- Re: invisible note for expressive marks,
Wols Lists <=