Re: hairpin length

[David Nalesnik]

Hi Simon,

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 18.06.2016 17:27, David Nalesnik wrote:
>>
>> (I would propose that bound-padding be redefined as a pair in the code
>> base.  Broken-bound-padding, too.  The latter is not replaced with a
>> broken-bound-padding-pair in this code experiment, but that should be easily
>> done.)
>
>
> Well, it should be pretty easy to use number-or-pair?, shouldn’t it? That
> way you can use both as a matter of convenience.
>

That should be workable.

Also, I see now that the situation with broken hairpins is a bit more
complex (bound-padding still does have an impact).  Will see what I
can do about that, and your suggestion, Simon.

David