Re: scheme-function to provide value for \include

[Urs Liska]

Am 29.06.2016 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> That's not what Johan is talking about. What he refers to is that the
>> > C #include syntax *looks* completely different from regular C/C++
>> > code, so nobody will mistake it for a regular function call or
>> > whatever.
>> >
>> > But \include *looks* like it's working the same as \shape.
> Where do you want to go from there?

Well, that's where I started this thread from.

Being used to the syntax for the include command I assumed that \include
is a function taking a string? argument and asked how to get there
without literally entering that string. Which is exactly due to the fact
that \include looks the same as \shape.

Urs

PS: By now I know why it doesn't work and have found a working solution
(just to avoid triggering further rounds of discussion)

-- 
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org