Re: Consecutive slurs with differing dash patterns

[tisimst]

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Am 8. Juli 2016 16:51:14 MESZ, schrieb Andrew Bernard <[hidden email]>:

>Consider this example:
>
>\version "2.19.44"
>
>{
>  \phrasingSlurDashed
>  c''4^\( c'' c''\)^\( c'' c''\)
>}
>
>How would one get the second phrasing slur to be solid, not dashed? I
>cannot simply place \phrasingSlurSolid between the end of the first
>slur
>and and start of the second.

Why not?
Can't you put the command before the first on *stops*?

Beat me to it. Like this:

{

  \phrasingSlurDashed

  c''4^\( c'' \phrasingSlurSolid c''\)^\( c'' c''\)

}

Not like this, because it has already begun (being attached to the previous note, but this applies it to the next one where there is no PhrasingSlur):

{

  \phrasingSlurDashed

  c''4^\( c'' c''\) \phrasingSlurSolid ^\( c'' c''\)

}

Best,

Abraham

---

View this message in context: Re: Consecutive slurs with differing dash patterns
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.