Re: tuplet bracket slope

[Gilberto Agostinho]

Hi Simon,


Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> On 09.07.2016 17:14, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
>> Andrew Bernard wrote
>>> What nonsense Gould writes here. I perceive duration in notation on any
>>> angle. The book is not always right in its justifications.
>> I think what Gould means is that duration is notated in the x-axis of a
>> staff, and so keeping beams close to the axis alignment is helpful. Maybe
>> her logic here is flawed, but then again most modern editions tend to
>> avoid
>> large slopes for beams nowadays.
> 
> It’s amazing how this makes an argument for kneed beams, so shunned by 
> most modern typesetters!

I don't think I understand why this makes an argument for kneed beams, can't
one can have the same slope for both a kneed beam and a non-kneed beam?

Cheers!
Gilberto



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/tuplet-bracket-slope-tp192294p192500.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.