|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Slur over single note? |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:48:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
Am 20.07.2016 um 04:26 schrieb Andrew
Bernard:
All the rest of the signs are phrasing slurs in this snippet. I would say it’s also a phrasing slur, and not a mistake or error. I disagree. I have skimmed through the whole score, and I'm still nearly sure (maybe now 98.5 % instead of merely 98 %) that this is an engraving error. If I'm not mistaken this is a piano reduction? If that's the case i'd assume there's a tied note or two slurred ones in an instrumental part here. I see two options here, depending on what you want with this score: 1 (the scholarly approach): Get hold of the full score and see if there's a part that warrants the slur/tie. If you find somethign adjust the thing accordingly. 2 (the flashy approach): Use the scholarLY package and produce a nice annotation with footnote. See attached input and result files. Of course you can base 2) on the results of 1) Best Urs
|
spurious-tie.ly
Description: Text Data
spurious-tie.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |