Re: LilyPond logo?

[Malte Meyn]

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
> Plus pdf
>
> 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
> address@hidden>:
>
> > Logo test enclosed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pierre

My opinions:
- #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more 
realistic (no overlapping pads, having a gap) and less black. But not 
100% convincing either (especially the pad).
- #4 is very dark and an even number of petals per layer looks weird 
(cannot say why, of course five per layer isn’t realistic either)
- I like the flower of #6 (but not it’s outline version #7) but I think 
it would need a better matching (more realistic) pad. This pad matches 
well with it’s original flower from your first proposal :)
- #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather 
than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more 
realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try 
to add a pad.
- #9 has a similar problem as #6: the styles of the flower (very static) 
and the pad (a little bit more vivid) don’t really match IMHO