[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BendSpanner-engraver
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: BendSpanner-engraver |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:32:21 +0100 |
David Nalesnik wrote Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: BendSpanner-engraver
> Hi Harm,
>
> This looks marvelous! I know nothing about the notation, but the demo
> file is simply beautiful to behold.
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 2016-09-11 20:38 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
>>> Hi Harm
>>>
>>> I'm not a fretted-string player, but this looks very impressive! This will
>>> be a tremendous addition to LP!
>>>
>>> Trevor
>>
>> Hi Trevor,
>>
>> currently the whole thing is more at pre-pre-alpha state ;)
>> Though, with David Nalesniks MeasureCounter we have at least one other
>> grob defined entirely in scheme, iirc.
>
> It is.
>
>> This encourages me :)
>>
>
> It would be simple enough to move the bits into the various files.
> This will be very satisfying in the case of bend-grob-defs.ly!
>
> One drawback, of course, is the issue of automatic documentation.
> There will be information in the IR (grob, interface, event), but the
> engraver won't be represented.
Could we not simply add a dummy .cc engraver which simply calls
the ADD_TRANSLATOR macro? Maybe just one could document
all Scheme engravers with several such calls. Worth a try?
Trevor
- Re: BendSpanner-engraver, (continued)
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, Federico Bruni, 2016/09/11
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, Trevor Daniels, 2016/09/11
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, Thomas Morley, 2016/09/13
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, Paul, 2016/09/12
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, David Nalesnik, 2016/09/13
Re: BendSpanner-engraver, Federico Bruni, 2016/09/16