[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
From: |
Anders Eriksson |
Subject: |
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10 |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:40:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 2016-09-14 12:07, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anders Eriksson"
<address@hidden>
To: "Knut Petersen" <address@hidden>; "lilypond-user"
<address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
I've tried to reproduce this on my Windows 10 machine using Process
Monitor to check file operations. I get an initial slow run with both
.42 and .43 (I didn't time .42, but .43 was 10.8 seconds). My second
run with .42 was 0.8 seconds, and 0.4 s with .43. So I can't help
much further unless I can reproduce the problem. My Windows version
in 10.0.14393 - what version is the problem appearing on? Do you have
files in c:\users\yourusername\.lilypond-fonts.cache-2 ? Do they
update every time LilyPond is run?
After deleting all the files in the .lilypond-fonts.cache-2 directory it
works like normal! Takes a bit longer the first time but not in later runs.
One thing that I noticed was that the latest files where called
ef9c9ad8cc5857eb63cb3660bc8bd202-i686-mingw32.cache-7.NEW
639439a01d569ee739160185e4d7a48e-i686-mingw32.cache-7.NEW
The were two files called exactly the same minus the .NEW also in the
directory.
Thanks for helping!
// Anders
- Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/09/06
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/09/06
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Simon Albrecht, 2016/09/06
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/08
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/08
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, tisimst, 2016/09/10
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/11
- Message not available
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/11
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Phil Holmes, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10,
Anders Eriksson <=
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, David Kastrup, 2016/09/11
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/06