Re: Augmentation dot positioning

[Carl Sorensen]

On 9/18/16 4:00 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Here's a patch.  But as Werner pointed out, it's not quite done yet.  I
>think I need to improve the badness scoring in order to get better
>configurations from which to remove excess dots.

There are two comments in the code that are wrong.

In a Dot_configuration, the index to the map is the staff position of the
dot.
The pos_ element of the Dot_position is the staff position of the notehead.

The comments reverse those two.

Sorry for the mistake,

Carl