lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question: Cross compilation


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:15:14 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; "Lilypond-User Mailing List" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation


On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 08:53 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
>
> and, more specifically, I would guess they are spent in creating the
> documentation (as this involves running LilyPond on thousands on
> examples). I say this because Denemo is built overnight for three
> targets with (son of) GUB, and that involves not only building LilyPond
> but also Gtk, Fluidsynth, PortAudio, PortMidi and quite a few other
> packages. (But not the LilyPond documentation, which, out of idleness
> with respect to setting it up, I always access online).
>
> Richard

No - I can build the docs on that machine in 15 minutes.  The day-long
compile is building the toolset that Gub uses.

In which case, I guess this is a one-off cost (unless the upstream
sources for the toolset change) on first build of a target architecture?

Richard


Generally, yes. If things are relatively constant, a gub build takes 1-2 hours.

--
Phil Holmes



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]