[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited! |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:28:34 -0500 |
Hi Kieren,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Kieren MacMillan
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> Further down in that thread is an implementation of shorten-pair with
>> hairpins:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-06/msg00277.html
>
> The $1,000,000 Question: Why isn’t this in the distro? =)
I think the interaction between this and other properties has to be
nailed down. I'm not sure if it behaves "as expected" in conjunction
with whatever other property affects endpoints (to-barline,
bound-padding).
I'd welcome testing.
Also, there's the issue of programming language. Should this
enhancement be added to the C++ original--easy enough-- or should the
distro ly:hairpin::print be replaced by a Scheme version?
I'd like to see the stencil function in Scheme, because it would then
be very convenient for users to adapt it to their needs.
A drawback would be speed, but would that even be noticeable?
>
> Thanks for this!
You're very welcome.
DN
- Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, David Sumbler, 2016/10/11
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/10/11
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, tisimst, 2016/10/11
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, David Sumbler, 2016/10/12
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/10/12
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, David Sumbler, 2016/10/13
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, Simon Albrecht, 2016/10/13
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, David Sumbler, 2016/10/14
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/14
- Re: Controlling hairpin length - revisited!, David Sumbler, 2016/10/20