[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:05:29 +0200 |
2016-10-21 22:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
>>> 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>>>> Different version number? Or missing support at compilation time? What
>>>> does
>>>>
>>>> ldd <path to LilyPond>
>>>>
>>>> state here?
>>>>
>>>> On my self-compiled LilyPond I see
>>>>
>>>> address@hidden:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ldd out/bin/lilypond
>> [...]
>>>
>>>> What's the set of libraries in the precompiled binary?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David Kastrup
>>>
>>> For 2.18.2 I get:
>>>
>> [...]
>>> For self-compiled 2.19.50 I get:
>> [...]
>>
>> Hard to read, thus same attached.
>
> It's probably sort of a red herring since the readline library is in
> neither version. Probably it depends on whether the readline
> development headers were available (in a version matching the installed
> libreadline on the target system) at the time Gub compiled libguile.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should.
I'd call it a bug not to have access to all guile-modules in released version.
If I understand correctly the readline-functionality depends on extern
librarys, maybe others are missing as well in released versions and
nobody ever noticed ...
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, (continued)
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Mark Knoop, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Sumbler, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/21
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/22
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/22
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/22
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/22
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, David Kastrup, 2016/10/22
- Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox, Thomas Morley, 2016/10/22