Re: Changing voice order...

[David Kastrup]

Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 09:54 , David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> << \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceThree ...
>>   \context Voice = "2" \with \voiceOne ...
>>   \context Voice = "3" \with \voiceTwo ...
>>   \context Voice = "4" \with \voiceFour ...
>
> I’m not sure whether this thread has progressed beyond the need to
> mention this (forgive me if it has), but this is repulsive.

Well, it is actually more like

<< \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceOne ...
   \context Voice = "2" \with \voiceThree ...
   \context Voice = "3" \with \voiceFour ...
   \context Voice = "4" \with \voiceTwo ... >>

because I misremembered the order.  But I assume that your qualification
would still apply.

> I mean that in as friendly a way as possible.

Well, I did mention that I was also for retiring \voiceOne...\voiceFour.

My current proposal would be more like

<< \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceUp ...
   \context Voice = "2" \with \inner \voiceUp ...
   \context Voice = "3" \with \inner \voiceDown ...
   \context Voice = "4" \with \voiceDown ... >>


At any rate, does that mean that you are fine with

<< \sopranoI \\ \alto \\ \sopranoII >>

and

<< \sopranoI \\ \altoII \\ \sopranoII \\ \altoI >>

because that is what we currently have?

-- 
David Kastrup