[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augmentation dots reg test
|
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Augmentation dots reg test |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:21:32 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.9.160926 |
On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than stacked
>notes? E.g. << <f a b c>4. // <a e,>2. >> (untested).
>
>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to understand
>which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an outstanding bug about
>horizontal positioning in this situation.
Here is the output of your test case. How would you like this to appear?
Thanks,
Carl
dots-poly.pdf
Description: dots-poly.pdf