[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:24:02 +0100 |
> On 2 Nov 2016, at 19:02, tisimst <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> ... as Kieren and I saw on a facebook group the other day when a composer
> started a discussion about having a bar with an "irrational" 2/6 time
> signature. Wow, the flames that ensued! It's quite simple:
>
> { \time 2/6 \tuplet 3/2 { c'4 c' } }
>
> ... with or without the tuplet number/bracket.
I gave an example of a true irrational time signature [1]. The code is actually
written in 12/8 (with a MIDI approximation in 19/8). In 12/8, as both the 3/8s
and the 2/8s are divided into four parts, tuplets will remain.
1. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-06/msg00237.html
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, kieren_macmillan kieren_macmillan, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, tisimst, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Chris Yate, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Martin Neubauer, 2016/11/03