[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:08:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed 02 Nov 2016 at 20:10:39 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 28 Oct 2016, at 21:48, David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri 28 Oct 2016 at 11:22:00 (-0700), Tobin Chodos wrote:
> >> Forgive me if this is a too-easy issue for the list, but: is there a way to
> >> define a time compound time signature such as 4/4 + 1/3? That is, the
> >> measure is four quarter notes long plus one triplet eighth note.
> >
> > Isn't this just 13/8? Three triplet eighth notes make a quarter note.
> > So it's 3+3+3+3+1 all over 8, and the notes will be written out as
> > four dotted quarter notes and an eighth note per measure.
>
> Indeed, 12/8 may be complicated notationally if the beats of length 3/8 are
> divided into twos and fours, so 4/4 might be preferred.
Now that would be interesting. Are the last three notes of the first
bar realistically performable? OTOH splitting the long notes into
threes would be straightforward to perform (and to write in 13/8).
The only 13/8 I can recall off-hand is an uncomplicated 6/4+1/8.
Cheers,
David.
13-8.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Kastrup, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, tisimst, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Chris Yate, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
David Wright <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Martin Neubauer, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03