Re: A tricky example -- polyMETER against polyRHYTHM

[N. Andrew Walsh]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding mclaren's example, but the graphic he posted has a number of notational errors. To wit:

in the third voice, if the meter is 11/8, then an 11:9 tuplet will not fill the bar, as it will only cover 9 eighth-notes. Perhaps he meant 9:11, in which case the meter needs to change to 9/8. Or the tuplet marking is superfluous. 

Tempo indications would be needed for each voice to indicate different tempi, or dotted lines so that it's clear that you're dealing with poly-tempo/poly-meter rhythmic relationships. Otherwise, it's not clear where things should align. 

Cheers,

A

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Klaus Blum <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi mclaren,

aaah, now I see what you wanted to achieve.
Same problem here: different blocks got messed up. It should look like this:

%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)

\paper  {
  indent=0
}

\layout {
  \context {
    \Score
    \accepts "TimeLine"
    \remove "Timing_translator"
    \remove "Default_bar_line_engraver"
  }
  \context {
    \Staff
    \consists "Timing_translator"
    \consists "Default_bar_line_engraver"
    \consists "Time_signature_engraver"
  }
}
%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers,
Klaus



--
View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/A-tricky-example-polyMETER-against-polyRHYTHM-tp196030p196039.html

Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user