[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing voice order...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Changing voice order... |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Nov 2016 22:35:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure if this is a language problem, or an attitude problem.
> Because it seems like you are coming to the opposite interpretation of what
> I say, despite me being very detailed in my explanation.
>
>
> Let's start with the main point:
>
> THE VERTICAL ORDER OF NOTES ON THE PAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORDER OF
> THE VOICES WITHIN THE << // // // >> CONSTRUCT, OR WHAT THE VOICE NAMES ARE
> CALLED
>
> Do you agree with that? You should, since it is true.
No, I don't agree with it. If you cannot distinguish "high correlation
though not 100%" from "no correlation", I don't see a point in
continuing. The reason the various shifts and stem directions are
assigned in the manner and order they are is because this tends to
minimize collisions for the _customary_ note order within voice
stacking. It's not arbitrary at all, so "nothing to do with" just is
plain wrong.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Changing voice order..., (continued)
Re: Changing voice order..., Mats Bengtsson, 2016/11/02
Re:Changing voice order..., Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order..., Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order..., Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order...,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Changing voice order..., Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2016/11/03
- Re: Changing voice order..., David Kastrup, 2016/11/03
Re: Changing voice order..., Simon Albrecht, 2016/11/06
Re: Changing voice order..., Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2016/11/03