[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
Martin Neubauer |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 2016 01:44:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
On 04/11/2016 01:13, mclaren wrote:
> This seems like an entirely valid question. 1/3 would be a single triplet
> note, right? That is, if we're dealing with (4 + 1/3)/4, then what we want
> is 4 quarter notes + 1 triplet quarter note, correct?
Wouldn't that be rather (4 + 2/3)/4?
--
Not the actual page, because it contains nothing. It's just the
content.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
Martin Neubauer <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Tobin Chodos, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04