Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator

[mclaren]

"Wouldn't that rather be (4 + 2/3)/4?"

Yes, I think you're right. 1/3 is presumably half of the value of a triplet
quarter note, so 1 triplet eighth note. I've corrected that in my second
Lilypond example. My bad.

Change the "6" denominator in my new Lilypond code to a 3 to get the meter
to display correctly. But the measures do print correctly, so this code
should get what Tobin Chodos wants, I think, 4 quarter notes + 1 triplet
eighth in every measure.





--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/compound-time-signature-with-non-duple-denominator-tp195829p196104.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.