Re: Quick question about accidentals

[Jacques Menu Muzhic]

Brilliant!

JM

> Le 26 nov. 2016 à 17:52, David Kastrup <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> David Sumbler <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Thanks for these 2 replies.  I have tidied things up a bit by using
>> 
>> \once \omit Accidental
>> 
>> as suggested by Noeck.
>> 
>> David's reply has given me several things to look up and think about
>> (which is good!).  The quoted "@", \single and \etc were all
>> effectively new to me - although I must have read about them more than
>> once in the NR.  I don't think I understand them well enough even now,
>> though, for me to have invented
>> 
>> "@"=\single \omit Accidental \etc
> 
> Well, @ is just an arbitrary character that isn't used yet by LilyPond.
> & would probably also have worked.  \single converts an override (like
> \omit Accidental) into the corresponding tweak.  \etc cuts a music
> function call short and results in a music function that expects the
> remaining arguments.  Sooo...
> 
> \omit Accidental is an override
> \single \omit Accidental is incomplete syntax missing a tweak target
> \single \omit Accidental \etc is a music function expecting such a target
> 
> So:
> 
>>> "@"=\single \omit Accidental \etc
>>> 
>>> { @cis1 }
> 
> Of course you can write this @ cis1 as well.  I was just aiming for a
> single-character version.
> 
> -- 
> David Kastrup
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user