lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New LilyPond website


From: H. S. Teoh
Subject: Re: New LilyPond website
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:32:36 -0800
User-agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1)

Just took a look at the latest version of the new website, and liked it.
Thanks for taking the time to make it work with NoScript.


--T

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 07:58:35PM -0500, John Roper wrote:
>    [1]jmroper.com/lilypond
>    On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:58 PM, John Roper <address@hidden>
>    wrote:
> 
>      Ok, I have updated the website. There is a little problem with the
>      sidebar pushing the other content down, but that is fine. My goal was to
>      recreate the current website using just html and css with a nicer look.
>      It does not require any js at all. This is just a sample so almost none
>      of the links actually work.
>      On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Chris Yate <address@hidden>
>      wrote:
> 
>        Having now looked at it, though only on my phone, I quite like it. But
>        I did have to scroll scroll scroll to read what would be about one
>        page of content.
> 
>        What I saw was a very "sexy" marketing site for Lilypond, and I think
>        it does it justice.
> 
>        However, as someone already sold on the tool, all I want to read is
>        the documents, or download binaries... I think I'm echoing the others
>        in saying I'd like to see what you can do with responsive design to
>        the documentation!
> 
>        I'd suggest as models, the docs for things like AngularJS, Bootstrap,
>        Ruby/Rails and Php. Although our documentation content is excellent,
>        I'm sure there's structural changes that could improve the
>        presentation, and certainly some responsive html/css... It's not my
>        forte but I think it might be one of yours! :)
> 
>        Chris
> 
>        On 29 Nov 2016 22:54, "Karlin High" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>          On 11/29/2016 4:42 PM, John Roper wrote:
>          > I am trying to build the lilypond docs now.
> 
>          Very good! Chances of the new website project being accepted seem
>          much
>          higher if you can figure out how that works, and not greatly upset
>          the
>          existing workflow for maintaining documentation and translations.
>          --
>          Karlin High
>          Missouri, USA
> 
>          _______________________________________________
>          lilypond-user mailing list
>          address@hidden
>          [6]https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
>      --
>      John Roper
>      Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist
>      Boston, MA USA
>      [7]http://jmroper.com/
> 
>    --
>    John Roper
>    Freelance Developer and Simulation Artist
>    Boston, MA USA
>    [8]http://jmroper.com/
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. http://jmroper.com/lilypond
>    2. mailto:address@hidden
>    3. mailto:address@hidden
>    4. mailto:address@hidden
>    5. mailto:address@hidden
>    6. https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>    7. http://jmroper.com/
>    8. http://jmroper.com/

> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


-- 
Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. Use your hands...



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]