[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New LilyPond website
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: New LilyPond website |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Dec 2016 12:38:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 3. Dezember 2016 11:42:35 MEZ, schrieb Federico Bruni <address@hidden>:
>Il giorno gio 1 dic 2016 alle 1:48, John Roper <address@hidden>
>
>ha scritto:
>> Why specifically do we *need* to use textinfo? If I could make a new
>> system that would auto generate the docs that works with the current
>> system would you use it?
>
>Good question, if limited to the website (don't touch the
>documentation, as it's extremely complex).
>What about discussing the constraints and requirements of a different
>build system for the website? If such a discussion was encouraging, I'd
>
>be happy to try to find a solution and hopefully work with other
>persons to make it possible.
>At least we would have a concise list of requirements for the next
>person who will offer to renovate the website.
I would also be in favour of this.
Maybe it would be good to have a Wiki page for outlining such a requirements
doc?
A suitable place for this would be the LilyPond clone on Github.
Urs
>
>Il giorno ven 2 dic 2016 alle 21:29, John Roper
><address@hidden> ha scritto:
>> This has turned into quite a bigger problem than I expected. I
>> understand your reasons, but as a more modernistic designer and
>> developer, I don't agree with most of your descisions no offense or
>> problem. I just don't think I am the best person for the job.
>
>John, you resisted more than I would have expected. I wonder if we'll
>ever see "the best person for _this_ job".
>It's not the first time and it won't be the last that we lose a
>potential contributor to the website. We discussed about this last
>year:
>https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-07/msg00108.html
>
>Probably there's some communication problem.
>Long-time LilyPond developers maybe can't see how hard and non-sense
>can be for a modern web developer having to do with texinfo, texi2html,
>
>etc. Especially if you intend to make substantial changes, as John did.
>
>I guess that they don't see the many flaws of our current web
>infrastructure.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
- Re: New LilyPond website, (continued)
- Re: New LilyPond website, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/12/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: New LilyPond website, Chris Yate, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Urs Liska, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Michael Gerdau, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Johan Vromans, 2016/12/12
- Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Urs Liska, 2016/12/11
Re: New LilyPond website, Federico Bruni, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: New LilyPond website, Karlin High, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2016/12/03
- Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2016/12/03
Re: New LilyPond website, Karlin High, 2016/12/03
Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2016/12/04
Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2016/12/04