[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing for s4
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing for s4 |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:50:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.0.161029 |
On 12/3/16 7:12 AM, "PMA" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>With such a simple solution (my using 'r' instead & setting
>rests to transparent), I'm not inclined to pursue the issue.
I suspect (although I haven't tried it) that using 'r' and setting the
stencil to #f would produce exactly the same output as using s.
>
>I do wonder, though, if spacers are not to make space (for
>themselves, so of course nudging the next event rightward),
>why they are called "spacers" at all.
Yes, that is an interesting question.
Until I reread the manual I had forgotten that spacer rests are really
called "invisible rests", which exactly describes what they do. Perhaps
we should change the documentation to have most of the text read
"invisible rest".
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Bad-Schemer syndrome, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Bad-Schemer syndrome, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, David Kastrup, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Carl Sorensen, 2016/12/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Thomas Morley, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Karlin High, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, David F., 2016/12/03