[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing for s4
From: |
PMA |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing for s4 |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:40:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 12/04/2016 11:50 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
...
Until I reread the manual I had forgotten that spacer rests are really
called "invisible rests", which exactly describes what they do. Perhaps
we should change the documentation to have most of the text read
"invisible rest".
Well, to my mind, that phrase only ambiguously describes what they do.
Because there are two visual issues here: whether & what the glyph is;
and whether space - to be filled or left empty - is being made for it.
"Invisible rest" doesn't settle both of these.
Come to think of it, "*spacer rest*" instead actually comes closer --
assuming anyway somewhere a strict definition.
P
- Re: Bad-Schemer syndrome, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Bad-Schemer syndrome, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/02
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, David Kastrup, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Carl Sorensen, 2016/12/04
- Re: Spacing for s4,
PMA <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Carl Sorensen, 2016/12/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Spacing for s4, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Thomas Morley, 2016/12/05
- Re: Spacing for s4, Karlin High, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, PMA, 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, David F., 2016/12/03
- Re: Spacing for s4, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/12/04