A term double slurs in LilyPond version 2.18.2.

[Mirosław Doroszewski]

A term double slurs in LilyPond version 2.18.2.

1. In the reply has been wtitten, that the term double slurs is true
and a proposition to change the term into a new one: multi slurs — is
false. It has been explained: it happens that somtimes composer wants
to link not every notes between chords or to slur at least 3 chords.
2. The term multi slurs suggests that at least 2 notes in a chord can
be linked. It does not implies that every notes in chords have to be
linked, even in slurring at least 3 chords.
3. So proposition is to make new commands: \multiSlursOn, \multiSlursOff.
4. By default lilypond links top-level single notes between chords.
5. The new command \multiSlursOn turns on slurring every notes in
chords, what can be unset to default setting with command
\multiSlursOff.
6. If composer wants link notes with slurs not usually, as it has been
descibed in solution received, developers could — normal their
practice — make form of command with additional, more complicated
settings. (I have noticed in manuals even 5 variables to set only 1
object!
7. Conclusion: the new term multi slurs are true.
8. Additionally, one could notice: a) suppose that composer have not
slurred 1 pair of notes in 2 chords, b) musician playing that will be
think nothing, because he will not notice this detail, or: if he would
notice this, could say: "Printing house made a mistake" thinking: "It
is not usual" — that only 1 pair of notes are not slurred in chords
with many notes.