lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OOoLilyPond


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: OOoLilyPond
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:49:50 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck <address@hidden>:
>>Hi,
>>
>>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained.
>>> Quite a pity ...
>>
>>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author
>>would agree to do so. 
>
> I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. 
>
>> I don't remember if there is a license with it,
>>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week.
>>
>>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the
>>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and
>>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance
>>might be better than nothing.
>
> So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under
> https://github.com/openlilylib.
>
> I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I
> don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector
> graphics (if that still is true)).

I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked,
Oolilypond did not make any use of it.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]