Re: OOoLilyPond

[Urs Liska]

Am 1. Januar 2017 20:49:50 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck
><address@hidden>:
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained.
>>>> Quite a pity ...
>>>
>>>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author
>>>would agree to do so. 
>>
>> I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. 
>>
>>> I don't remember if there is a license with it,
>>>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week.
>>>
>>>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the
>>>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and
>>>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance
>>>might be better than nothing.
>>
>> So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under
>> https://github.com/openlilylib.
>>
>> I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I
>> don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector
>> graphics (if that still is true)).
>
>I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked,
>Oolilypond did not make any use of it.

Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to 
maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a huge 
selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word.

Urs

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.