[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distance of secondary beams
From: |
Paul |
Subject: |
Re: Distance of secondary beams |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:01:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
On 01/18/2017 03:13 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I think it needs better expressing - how does one go about submitting
documentation improvement requests?
If you wanted to go beyond a bug report with suggested rewording, you
could submit a patch. The doc strings for grob properties like this one
are in scm/define-grob-properties.scm
Like so:
(length-fraction ,number? "Multiplier for lengths. Used for
determining ledger lines and stem lengths.")
The contributor's guide documents how to submit patches.
Cheers,
-Paul
- Distance of secondary beams, Urs Liska, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Malte Meyn, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Abraham Lee, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Urs Liska, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Noeck, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Noeck, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Noeck, 2017/01/17
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Andrew Bernard, 2017/01/18
- Re: Distance of secondary beams, Urs Liska, 2017/01/18
- Re: Distance of secondary beams,
Paul <=