Re: Section repeat

[Hans Åberg]

> On 2 Feb 2017, at 22:41, Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> I'd say, in general, you need as many alternatives as there is unique 
> material.  
> 
> Only 1 & 3 are the same, so you can combine those.
> 2 and 4 differ in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end of the measures, 
> you need one alternative each.
> 
> This means three alternatives:
> 1 & 3
> 2
> 4  
> 
> Which is to say, I agree with how you did it in the second half of your 
> example.

Indeed, combining 2 & 4 looked wrong. It is a curious example in that the music 
lines of these are exactly the same, including the binding note at the end.