[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website] |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2017 01:20:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ok, since I am not apparently getting _any_ answers but just unrelated
buzzphrases pasted to the top of the quoted communication time and
again, I will briefly point out first how we communicate on this list.
One quotes the _pertinent_ part of the documentation first, then adds
one's answers usually in-line to the pertinent questions.
John Roper <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Feb 4, 2017 5:59 PM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> John Roper <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> My question probably was not clear enough. What tangible benefits for
>>> >>> LilyPond's website and its ongoing maintenance do we expect to reap from
>>> >>> a move to Blended as its content management system?
>>> >
>>> > Design update.
>>>
>>> So this content management system prescribes a particular design, or
>>> makes implementing a particular design easier?
Still unanswered.
>>> > It looks better and attracts more users to the software.
>>>
>>> Last time I looked, users were not selecting their software by leafing
>>> through random web pages until they find a generally good-looking one
>>> and then being attracted to the software it advertises.
>>>
>>> At any rate, I wasn't really asking for advertising slogans here but
>>> rather concrete examples of stuff that would improve under such a
>>> change.
>
> I wrote the Blended system to fit all of the requirements for
> redesigning the website (not documentation) for LilyPond. A nice side
> effect was that I can use it for other things.
Not addressing the request.
Could you give concrete examples of stuff that would be expected to
improve under a change of the content management system to Blended?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], (continued)
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], Simon Albrecht, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website],
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], Urs Liska, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2017/02/06
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/02/07
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/07
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/08