Re: with and set

[Noeck]

Hi David,

>> What are cases in which that makes a difference? I always thought they
>> were equivalent.
> Once you take over the job of LilyPond, we might take note that you
> consider them equivalent and change the documentation.  In the meantime,
> LilyPond's thoughts about the issue are more relevant.

Strange answer. Did I ever say that I expect LilyPond to do what I
thought? I was just asking for a counter-example.

> Is it really too much to ask to just follow the reference given as
> justification in the issue?

Well, I read the whole page but I did not follow the links. Thanks for
pointing me to it. I understand now.

Joram