Re: 48 and 72 ET

[David Kastrup]

Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:

>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:44, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:24, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:10, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 22:47, Cole Ingraham <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I've used Sagittal notation based on http://x31eq.com/lilypond/
>>>>>>>> before. I don't know if that still works with more recent versions
>>>>>>>> though. Haven't touched it in a while.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I get an error in LilyPond 2.19.45, with an unbound variable "parser":
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here
>>>>>>> # (ly:parser-set-note-names parser EqualFiftythreePitchNames)
>>>>>>> Unbound variable: parser
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there any reason people don't use convert-ly when upgrading to a
>>>>>> newer version?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe because it is in some library files.
>>>> 
>>>> That doesn't even make sense.
>>> 
>>> The code makes use of three different external libraries.
>> 
>> So?  Why wouldn't you upgrade the libraries when upgrading LilyPond?
>
> Those are not my libraries. I updated some, that is hacked them to
> work, but that was a year ago.

And that means that you are not allowed to run convert-ly on them but
have to edit them by hand instead?

I'll stick with my "that doesn't even make sense" verdict, thank you
very much.

-- 
David Kastrup