lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No R in input! (Proposal for discussion)


From: Wols Lists
Subject: Re: No R in input! (Proposal for discussion)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:04:31 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0

On 02/04/17 21:24, David Kastrup wrote:
>> But does it actually demand too much of an engraver to take an r4*7
>> > event, check whether and how many full or partial measures are in its
>> > duration, write full-bar or multi-measure rests for all parts spanning
>> > full measures and normal rests for the remainder?

> What about "is fundamentally different in meaning" was unclear?  The
> rests have completely different visuals, not "just" different alignments
> and different numbers of grobs.

Maybe the bit about "the syntax is meaningless in context?"

As I understand it, in the relevant context, "R" is meaningless but full
or multiple bar rests are printed anyway?

It's ancient music, so all our pre-concieved notions of "correct" are
pretty dodgy, anyway :-)

Cheers,
Wol



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]