lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback on cross stave slur


From: Michiel Sikma
Subject: Re: Feedback on cross stave slur
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:24:08 +0900

Hi Andrew,

Thanks on both counts, I didn't realize there wasn't supposed to be a slur there at all. If there isn't one in Beethoven's manuscript I won't add one either. My intention is to just engrave an urtext version.

You are right that A4 is just too small. I'm still not sure what to do. Actually, I already set the global magnification to 89/100 - because without it, I couldn't comfortably do the long 32rd note passages in Op.111, which I worked on earlier. I might reduce it just a bit more, so that it's smaller but at least has decent margins.

I'm actually surprised that the 1st edition you pointed me to has two separate slurs over the 8.-16 and 4-8, rather than one big slur over both. If that's how Beethoven wrote it I've got a lot of fixing to do...Times like this is when I wish I had a nice high quality manuscript like I did for Op.111...

Michiel


On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Michiel,

The Artaria engraving of about 1819 is freely available at IMSLP. This is very beautifully done, a model of excellence. Possibly better than finding the MS because I suspect it contains many corrections.

http://imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Sonata_No.29,_Op.106_(Beethoven,_Ludwig_van)

No slur is present over the sequence you referred to.

If I were engraving this work, I would be doing it off this edition. The large amount of 'air' in the edition is something I find very important.


Andrew



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]