[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again
From: |
Robert Blackstone |
Subject: |
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again |
Date: |
Sun, 14 May 2017 15:22:36 +0200 |
Hi David,
Ref.: "What's the role of TeXShop? What process did it carry out? "
TeXShop, by means of its LilyPond Engine, processed the file containing the
code copied from Frescobaldi. I processed the file with two LilyPond versions,
2.18.2 and 2.19.58.1, and as far I could see the results were identical.
I always use TeXShop to edit LilyPond-files because it allows me to use some
tricks and shortcuts that Frescobaldi does not like, or does not allow. As
TeXShop always saves files with the extension .tex I rename the copies
(_ly.tex). So the pdf in the package I uploaded was made with TeXShop.
Incidentally, It is not really necessary to make a copy of the code generated
by Frescobaldi from the xml-file. I can open and process the .ly -file with
TeXShop just as well. But for most of the scores I make I have to do quite a
lot of editing for which I always use TeXShop.
Ref.: "The 2.19 files might be of more interest as 2.18.2 doesn't have the
problem."
There is no separate and/or different 2.19 file. The .ly -file generated from
the downloaded -xml-file produced the same result with 2.18.2 and 2.19.58.1.
Best regards,
Robert
On 14 May 2017, at 14:24 , David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun 14 May 2017 at 12:42:03 (+0200), Robert Blackstone wrote:
>> Hi Leszek,
>>
>> Out of curiosity I downloaded and processed the Kyrie.xml, from the link you
>> attached to your post of 12-05-17.
>> I was curious in particular because I mostly use the same procedure for
>> engraving with LilyPond as you do, starting with Finale, except that I'm on
>> a Mac (OSX 10.9.5 also known as Mavericks).
>> So I imported your file in Frescobaldi, and then copied and pasted it in
>> TeXShop, my favourite editor, which processed your file without any problem
>> (both with LilyPond version 2.18.2 and 2.19.58.1).
>
> So with Frescobaldi you import the XML (which uses the musicxml2ly
> program; you posted the .ly) and then produce the PDF (posted).
> What's the role of TeXShop? What process did it carry out?
>
>> You can find the results here:
>>
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/512573/FileChute/LilyPond-test_Kyrie_from_xml-file.zip
>
> The 2.19 files might be of more interest as 2.18.2 doesn't have the problem.
>
>> So apparently for a Mac there is nothing wrong, neither with your xml-file
>> nor with recent musicxml2ly.
>> It may be of litte help to you (as long as you stay on Windows ;-)) but it
>> could perhaps help you in narrowing down the search for the source of
>> trouble in your system.
>
>> On 12 May 2017, at 13:42 , Leszek Wroński <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> […] Anyway, since one and the same XML file stopped
>>> converting correctly, it indeed seems that in the meantime some
>>> encoding issues have been introduced to musicxml2ly (I'm using 2.19.48
>>> now).
>
> Cheers,
> David.
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, (continued)
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Johan Vromans, 2017/05/12
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Leszek Wroński, 2017/05/12
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Leszek Wroński, 2017/05/12
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Robert Blackstone, 2017/05/14
- Message not available
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Robert Blackstone, 2017/05/15
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Leszek Wroński, 2017/05/16
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Leszek Wroński, 2017/05/16
Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Leszek Wroński, 2017/05/12
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Phil Holmes, 2017/05/12
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Phil Holmes, 2017/05/14
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Phil Holmes, 2017/05/14
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Urs Liska, 2017/05/14
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, Phil Holmes, 2017/05/14
- Re: XML to .ly and Lilypond, again, with a fix, David Wright, 2017/05/15