[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Permission for music
From: |
mskala |
Subject: |
Re: Permission for music |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2017 17:19:22 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) |
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> > This is one reason that putting advertising for the LilyPond Web site in
> > every PDF document by default may not be such a great idea. It makes
> > LilyPond appear to have a meaningful connection with the content.
>
> Only if you overlook that the tagline specifically says the music was
> _engraved_ with LilyPond, which does not tell anything about any connection
> between LilyPond and the _content_.
But people do overlook that, as this thread demonstrates.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- Permission for music, Sarah Fosdick, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Manuela Gößnitzer, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Simon Albrecht, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music,
mskala <=
- Re: Permission for music, Karlin High, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- RE: Permission for music, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Kastrup, 2017/05/25