[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Permission for music
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Permission for music |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2017 08:59:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> > This is one reason that putting advertising for the LilyPond Web
>> > site in every PDF document by default may not be such a great idea.
>> > It makes LilyPond appear to have a meaningful connection with the
>> > content.
>>
>> Only if you overlook that the tagline specifically says the music was
>> _engraved_ with LilyPond, which does not tell anything about any
>> connection between LilyPond and the _content_.
>
> But people do overlook that, as this thread demonstrates.
People vote for Trump and Brexit given the chance. At some point of
time, you just need to give them all the info and pray. You cannot hope
to save them from themselves.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Permission for music, (continued)
Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Simon Albrecht, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, Karlin High, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, mskala, 2017/05/24
- Re: Permission for music, David Wright, 2017/05/24
- RE: Permission for music, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2017/05/24
Re: Permission for music,
David Kastrup <=