[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock
From: |
mskala |
Subject: |
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:03:53 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Michael Käppler wrote:
> foo.ily:
> \include "bar.ly"
> bar.ly:
> \include "foo.ily"
> Am I right to consider this a bug?
I don't think so - at least not a bug in Lilypond. It's just doing what
you told it to do, and most other language parsers that have an "include"
facility will similarly be unable to give a useful result when fed
infinitely recursive include files. The usual advice to users is not to
write such input.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock,
mskala <=
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Simon Albrecht, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Johan Vromans, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, caagr98, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Simon Albrecht, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21
- Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, mskala, 2017/06/21
Re: Circular dependencies - Deadlock, Michael Käppler, 2017/06/21